The Global Warming Fraud
Is Global Warming possibly the greatest fraud that has been perpetrated in modern history?
Throughout history small sections of communities have instigated schemes to create a situation that will be profitable for this small minority. This situation can usually be easiest to start in a period of economic downturn. Slowly start a rumour within the community that can be built into a tidal wave. This usually takes the input of money for the initial media stories to ever find the light of day.
In more recent times we only need to look at back to the economic havoc that the Y2K bug in computers was going to cause. This problem was know to exist from the earliest days of computing. The old windows DOS was built with the problem well known. It was assumed that DOS had a limited shelf life and would be replaced well before any problems began to develop. The problem was that the replacement never happened.
The question has never been asked. Why did the major software developers continue to develop increasingly sophisticated applications that were tied to a known problem at the very core of all operations? Either the software companies were making too much money from these programs to care about any future problems that may arise or they knew exactly what they were doing. Was this a deliberate plan to create exactly the situation that occurred? Wait until the correct time to start the rumour that every computer would fail and slowly build panic to the point that no one would question the billions of dollars necessary to stop the whole world from going into total meltdown on the stroke of midnight 2000. This was one of the greatest doomsday situations that had ever been perpetrated.
My knowledge of computing is tiny to say the least so I do not know how real the Y2K problem was. I did have a computer at the time and continued to operate properly after midnight with no problems. It did not cease to work or melt into a heap of useless metal or anything else after that date. It continued to work as designed for a couple of years until it finally died of old age.
What has all this got to do with global warming?
The Y2K bug shows how billions of dollars can be generated in only a couple of years to solve a problem that did or did not exist. Already it is possible to see a very small scale of the potential fortunes that can be made simply by starting this latest doomsday scenario. This time these companies are not looking at a solution over a couple of years. They will be reaping the vast rewards well into the future. This will continue over far longer than the next 50 years. The vast sums of money to be made by a few of the worlds largest corporations will be enough for them to purchase the majority of countries across the globe.
To understand what is happening it is necessary to look at a few of the disasters that are being predicted.
Firstly it is not a problem to sell a doomsday situation to the entire world. All that is necessary is to invent a problem that sounds real. Every religion, religious text, and preacher indoctrinates us with the belief in the ultimate doomsday from the day we are born. Back this up with a new rumour that can be convincing enough to run in every form of media across the world and the stage is set for possibly the greatest scam ever invented.
The scam was actually started decades ago when the idea of a looming world oil shortage was first floated. This has never been real but it certainly helped push up the price of oil. It was easy to blame the oil cartels of the Middle East for this increase in price but that has always been a total lie. Middle East oil only costs in the vicinity of $US7.00 a barrel to produce.. None of the difference between production cost and market value goes to the oil cartels. It is a market engineered increase.
While the cost of oil was kept low it was naturally impossible to look at using any of the new forms of energy production being invented. Solar panels, wind turbines, hot rock technology to name but a few in a very long list. These all had one thing in common. They could never compete with cheap oil. All those companies developing new forms of energy worth billions that would never be used unless oil was forced to a far greater price. One simple way to make this happen was to start a couple of wars in oil producing countries. This, as we all know, had an effect on prices when we paid for fuel at the bowser. Even this was not enough so more needed to be done.
Another idea to be started and pushed to the extent that was accepted as an absolute necessity throughout Western Countries. The banks had previously been the major holder of savings funds. These funds were great for for the profits of banks but most of these profits were limited by government controlled interest rates. How to gain access to this vast amount of money? The answer was to convince governments of the need for superannuation. This would add trillions of dollars into the stock market. With the money now available there were new forces that could manipulate the prices of any product. Millions of barrels of oil are purchased and held in storage. This creates an artificial shortage that forces up the price and the companies take the profits. As storage capacities are increased more oil can be removed from the market thus increasing the shortage further. The shortages are artificial but the price increases are real. We are the owners of this superannuation and the only demand that we make is for an ever increasing profit. We do not care how these profits are made. We do constantly complain because of the increase in price of fuel at the bowser.
Australia has vast know oil and gas reserves that would make us 100% self sufficient for the at least the next 200 years. We currently produce only 20% of our needs in oil. The rest of the well heads have been capped. If this oil was accessed for use it would destroy the growing market for alternative energy. Australian Bass Straight oil costs approximately $AU5.00 a barrel to produce. If we have enough known oil for our own needs why do we pay the current price as set using the Singapore bench mark? Why does the Australian government allow the wealth of this country to be used to pay artificially inflated prices internationally for oil that we do not need?

This has not arrived at global warming yet but it is well under way.
It would be expected that the general population would not accept these rapid increase in oil prices without complaint. The next step was to find a cause that the worlds population would take as more important than the oil price increases.
That new cause is global warming.
One early idea to help combat this newly invented threat was to use less oil by producing more bio fuels.
What is this idea accomplishing
  • Farmers are able to make a far greater return on their investment. Their crops suddenly become of far greater value.
  • Vast areas of land previously used for food production is now being used to produce bio fuel crops.
  • Millions more people across the world are now condemned to a slow death by starvation and millions more will follow as less food is produced.
  • We save a few cents a litre on these new fuels such as E10.
  • Those people dying of starvation are in some backward 3rd world country and we will never see the results. It is not our problem as long as we save a bit off the cost of fuel.
  • Every time you fill your car with bio fuel mix saving a few cents a litre and giving yourself a pat on the back for saving the planet you have condemned another person to death by starvation.
Another fact is that it takes energy to produce energy. Wind farms are currently in the development phase. Some of these cover kilometres with thousands of wind turbines being used. These turbines take energy from the wind to produce electricity. Taking energy from the wind slows it down. With the relatively small number of these farms there may be no noticeable effect. What is going to happen to the climate as these wind farms are expanded to such an extent that they can affect the climate in an area or even entire regions. The inventers of the internal combustion engine probably had the same answer and would have told the world that there would never be a problem. By all the laws of physics there will be an affect but I have never seen a detailed study that tries to predict what will happen.
Solar panels take energy from the sun and convert it to electricity. The area surrounding these solar collection areas will become cooler and the amount of energy being reflected back into the atmosphere will also be reduced. What will happen to the climate in these area as the number of solar panels are increased to such an extent that weather is affected. Again I have never seen a detailed study about this.
The energy in hot rocks across central Australia is also being investigated. These are vast areas and contain enough energy to last for several centuries. Where are the studies that show the affects that cooling these rocks will have? One obvious problem that I can see is the reduction or even stopping the flow of water from the Great Artesian Basin. This flow relies upon the pressure built up by the heated water. The beef cattle and sheep industry is very important to the economy of Australia. The majority of inland properties rely on this water for their very existence. Even if it is possible to pump this water to the surface the cost would be prohibitive.
As little as 50 years ago anyone who said that the burning of fossil fuels would create the potential to alter the weather conditions on this planet would have been derided as some form of radical doomsday cultist.
Most people who read this article will no doubt disagree with a lot that I have written. I would certainly appreciate the results of the studies that you use in your arguments against me.
The only real solution that I can see to the problems we are creating is to decrease the energy that we are using. There are many ways that this can be easily achieved and I will write more on these in a future article.
For now I will just say to look around you and see what difference you can make. This is not only a problem for governments and business it is a problem for each and every person who lives on this planet. We all do something toward living together or we all die together.
Contact: jalal@aiic.com.au